Michael New: Update on this Patriot

MICHAEL NEW, AMERICAN PATRIOT SEEKS JUSTICE

Latest News - release 23 September 2004October 10 - Michael New Day - celebrate by burning a UN flag, or shooting holes in a U.N. flag, or writing to your Congressman, educating your children about the nature of an oath of enlistment, about the Constitutional prohibition of serving under foreign military command, etc. Educate one person, and you double your effectiveness! (Need a flag? We have them! Suitable for burning, target shooting, door mats, etc. October 19 - Oral Arguments to be heard in US District Court, Washington, D.C., the Honorable Paul Friedman presiding. Only NINE years and NINE days since SPC Michael New reported to formation, wearing an authorized battle dress uniform, and refused to accept a U.N. uniform, a U.N. commanding officer, or a U.N. deployment to Macedonia.One of the attorneys for the defense (the U.S. government) was an officer at the time, serving in Macedonia (and therefore presumably under the United Nations). He said he was looking forward to trying the case on its merits! And then someone higher up told him how it's really going to be, and he filed a motion to dismiss. Judge Friedman denied that motion, so they filed another one! Somewhat irregular, and risks offending the Court. So WE filed a motion asking for oral arguments on the question to dismiss! VERY irregular, but it was granted! Friedman has stated, on the record, that this case has merit. In 1996. He invited this case back to his court after it ran its course in the military courts. So, on October 19, attorneys for both sides will argue before the judge about whether they are going to continue to argue! Thanks to the generous support of many of you, most of the money due to the lawyers has already been sent in! How can we po! ssibly ever say thanks to all of you? Only our Father in Heaven can know how many have helped, in SO many ways, And we can only thank Him! We're not going to the time and expense to travel to Washington for this hearing. It's a technicality. But we do live and die on each one of these questions now. After this hearing, we expect a decision from the judge within 30 days. And then, assuming we win, a date will then be set for oral arguments on the merits themselves. For the first time in nine years. There is nothing like the "swift and imperative remedy of a speedy trial" -- nothing at all.There are remedies possible by any branch of government. The course we are pursuing is within the Judicial system. But Congress could solve this problem, if they had the backbone to do so. They could simply pass a law that forbids the placing of US military personnel under the UN or other multi-national! authorities. (And a variation on that theme is that each State could pass binding legislation to forbid the agencies of that State from doing business with agency of the U.N.; could require anyone working on behalf of the UN to register as a foreign agent; could ban the flying of UN flags on State or Muncipal property, etc. We have a model bill in the works, and if you want a copy to present to your state legislator, please let us know.)And then, there's the president -- if Mr. Clinton could INvoke the executive order that authorized himself to ignore the Constitution and ignore the law, and send American soldiers under the UN, then is it not logical that Mr. Bush can REvoke the same executive order with the stroke of a pen? If he wanted to. Why doesn't he? He doesn't answer our mail. Maybe he will answer yours. We would like to know the reason Mr. Bush refuses to revoke PDD 25, a totally unconstitutional executive order.

For a Sovereign, Constitutional Republic, once again,
Daniel NewProject ManagerMichael New Action FundP.O. Box 100Iredell, Texas 76649www.MikeNew.com/www.UN-freeZone.org/ www.UNWatch.com/
Real Americans don't wear UN blue!

From the blog publisher: This was a case evolving from Clinton's attempt to put American soldiers in UN uniforms under foreign commanders violating the UCMJ and the Constitution of the United States. This Spec 4 had the guts to oppose the illegal order and bring attention to the Clinton Administration's attempt to put American service personnel, sworn to wear no foreign uniform, in UN uniforms. As a result Michael New was dishonorably discharged and for nearly a decade his family and friends have been fighting to get justice through the justice system. Every American should be paying attention to this case. This is exactly what Kerry has repeatedly said he would do if President. The Democrats power base have every intention of turning over our nation's defense to the United Nations. This must not be Allowed.

Michael Turley, Blog Editor