Remembering Shirley Sherrod

Ah yes, the case for a few thousand bucks the ballooned into a 1.25 billion dollar windfall profit. I don't know who the author was of this well put together report on the Sherrod and her cohort [OMG! Obama!] scam. But wow! Guess Barry's plan for "cleaning up" DC meant "cleaning up in DC!" By golly the Chicago to DC connection is much more intriguing than the French Connection. Ahhhh the old Capone-Daley dance team is small potatoes compared to the Daley-Obama show. Wow and Wow.

Andrew Breitbart lays the trap for Sherrod's fraud

Andrew Breitbart is a media genius. I don't know who wrote this but this is just terrific. Sent to a friend of mine.

He proved it originally with his brilliant handling of the ACORN ‘hooker’ scandal which he skillfully manipulated so that the corrupt media was forced, against its will, to broadcast corruption in one of Obama’s most powerful political support groups. But Breitbart’s handing of that affair is nothing compared to his brilliant manipulation of the Shirley Sherrod ‘white farmer’ scandal.

It all began last Monday, July 22, 2010. As the country watched in horror, Breitbart released a snippet of a tape on his “Big Government” site which showed an obscure black female official of the Dept. of Agriculture laughing to a roomful of NAACP members about how she’d discriminated against a destitute white farmer and refused to give him the financial aid he desperately needed. As she smirked to the room, she’d sent him instead to a white lawyer – ‘one of his own kind’ – for help. The black woman was Shirley Sherrod – and almost immediately she became the center of a firestorm of controversy which exploded throughout the country. Within a day of the release of that infamous tape, the head of the Dept. of Agriculture, spurred on by Obama, demanded – and received – Sherrod’s resignation. Breitbart had won.

But then seemingly Breitbart’s actions began to explode in his face. As Sherrod screamed in protest, FOX News released the entire text of her speech last March to the NAACP. And there on tape Sherrod was shown supposedly repenting of her racism against a white farmer and instead championing his fight to win funds to keep his farm afloat. Within hours of that entire tape being revealed, the entire world turned against Andrew Breitbart. Conservatives throughout the country were enraged that he’d endangered their reputations by releasing a ‘doctored’ tape. Breitbart, they thundered, had dealt a fatal blow to the conservative media. I confess that I also was horrified at what I saw as the clumsiness and stupidity of Breitbart in ‘doctoring’ a tape to make a supposedly innocent woman look guilty. But now I discover I have been as guilty of haste to judgment of Breitbart as the Dept. of Agriculture was of Ms. Sherrod.

Only now am I realizing the real purpose for Breitbart’s release of that tape snippet. It was to allow him to cunningly trick the media into exposing one of the most shocking examples of corruption in the federal government – a little known legal case called “Pigford v. Glickman”.

http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2010/07/27/pigford-v-glickman-86000-claims-from-39697-total-farmers/?singlepage=ue

“In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States Department of Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied USDA loans due to racial discrimination during the period 1983 to 1997.” The case was entitled “Pigford v. Glickman” and in 1999, the black farmers won their case. The government agreed to pay each of them as much as $50,000 to settle their claims.

But then on February 23 of this year, something shocking happened in relation to that original judgment. In total silence, the USDA agreed to release more funds to “Pigford”. The amount was a staggering $1.25 billion. This was because the original number of plaintiffs – 400 black farmers – had now swollen in a class action suit to include a total of 86,000 black farmers throughout America.

There was only one teensy problem. The United States of America doesn’t have 86,000 black farmers. According to accurate and totally verified census data, the total number of black farmers throughout America is only 39,697. Oops.

Well, gosh – how on earth did 39,697 explode into 86,000 claims? And how did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion? Well, folks, you’ll just have to ask the woman who not only spearheaded this case because of her position in 1997 at the “Rural Development Leadership Network” but whose family received the highest single payout (approximately $13 million) from that action – Shirley Sherrod. Oops again.

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/110/024/Is_There_More_to_Sherrods_Dismissal.html

Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the United States – a fraud enabled solely because she screamed racism at the government and cowed them into submission. And it gets even more interesting. Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and abetted her in this race fraud. As it turns out, the original judgment of “Pigford v. Glickman” in 1999 only applied to a total of 16,000 black farmers. But in 2008, a junior Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and allow more black farmers to sue for funds. The Senator was Barack Obama.

Because this law was passed in dead silence and because the woman responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA official, American taxpayers did not realize that they had just been forced in the midst of a worldwide depression to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a race claim.

But Breitbart knew. And last Monday, July 22, 2010, he cleverly laid a trap which Sherrod – and Obama – stumbled headfirst into which has now resulted in the entire world discovering the existence of this corrupt financial judgment. Yes, folks – Breitbart is a genius.

As for Ms. Sherrod? Well, she’s discovered too late that her cry of ‘racism’ to the media which was intended to throw the spotlight on Breitbart has instead thrown that spotlight on herself – and her corruption. Sherrod has vanished from public view. Her ‘pigs’, it seems, have come home to roost. Oink!

The problem is that Shirley will be "Oinking" with 13 million [hmmmdoes her hubby get 13 million too?] dollars of whose money? And what is the junior senator getting for his part in this scam. And who gets the balance of the 1.25 billion smackers? Wonder how many of them are tied to Obama? Maybe that is what they meant when they said Madam Michelle is paying her own vacationing expenses? [yeah, right and pig fly everyday too]

How much evidence of corruption do we need before we overhaul all branches of government right down to the state legislatures and put the Constitutional Republic back in order? And while we are diss-cussing that bit of necessary reform boot the UN and Federal Reserve OUT! Electoral College-OUT! Something called the National Debate Committee or whatever, you know the one designed to keep candidates who might bring up real issues out of the public forums debates-OUT. We could begin by NULLIFYING all the ILLEGAL Amendments to the Constitution, which would be every single one since 1861! Wow! There goes the Federal Reserve Act and the "Caste Act" - oh sorry that's the 14th Amendment. You see it actually does exactly the opposite of what it pretends. ah there is so much to taking out large stockpiles of trash. Then there is the necessary reformation. With the clean slate of illegal Amendments goes nearly all the illegal legislation from 1861 forward...Gee! Now the Federal Government is out of the regulating domestic production and not f&%@ng with the GNP and with real interest free currency [NO Foreign Bankers Fractional Banking scams Yea!] Limited terms and ending "Political" as a career plan. End that and we are on our way to Restoring the Constitutional Republic.

But will the Shirley Sherrod-Senator Obama scam result in any criminal action? Ah to be above the law.