THE AXIOMATIC PRINCIPLE OF NULLIFICATION

The political discourse on "Nullification" is not new. Actually it was a basic upon which the Virginia ratification convention and back into the colonial period before. Thomas Jefferson further expounded upon this important principle by which remedy of state interposition is preserved to protect the state from all laws which violate the Constitution during his drafting of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798. Today our elite media dictated to by the reining oligarchy would have us believe that is a radical new concept. In fact it has always been in the mainstream of political thought from the fundamental principles of the Constitutional Republic.

Nullification begins with the axiomatic point that a federal law that violates the Constitution is no law at all, the simple truth that it is void and of no effect.

Nullification carries that UNCONTROVERSIAL point to the execution of that guiding principle that if a law is unconstitutional and void and of no effect, it is the duty of the state as parties of the federal COMPACT to declare it unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it. It would be an exercise in futility to wait for the federal government or any branch thereof to condemn and rescind its own law.

As Jefferson pointed out the central point of "nullification" is that the federal government cannot be permitted to hold a monopoly on constitutional interpretation. For if the federal government had the exclusive right to judge the extent of its powers [as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson warned] it will grow regardless of the separation of powers, elections and other limitations which are tried to oppose it.

The Constitution cannot be expected to be self enforcing. Like any law it only has power such as WE THE PEOPLE enforce. As we have seen the checks and balances of the legislative, judicial and executive branches of government provide little guarantee of limited government. The three branches have united against the independence of the states and conspired to intrude upon the rights of WE THE PEOPLE. It is the sacred duty of the states to protect its people from unconstitutional, illegal laws. It is the moral obligation and responsibility of the people of the states to assure that their states do so. It is unconstitutional and unprincipled, therefore morally and ethically corrupt, for the federal government to have powers over individual states rights or intrude upon individual liberty. That is the axiomatic principle of nullification. This principle of right ought to be above debate.

It goes without saying that unconstitutional laws have been and are being passed. Likely most of the Federal Laws are doubtlessly unconstitutional. Obviously petitions by WE THE PEOPLE, objecting to such laws has little if any affect. What about the courts? There are volumes written about federal courts and states courts failures to police the federal and even state governments. The problem is that they have all become agents of the CORPORATE STATE. We must not surrender to the notion that any illegal law must be complied with just because it is imposed by government. NO! That is not FREEDOM.

Even the Federalist/Loyalist Alexander Hamilton in Federalist #78 stated, "There is no position which depends upon clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is VOID. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men, acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid."

We will see this debate when the controversy over unconstitutional laws arises in the very near future. There is going to be a thunderous argument over whom has the power to declare a law unconstitutional and whom may declare an unconstitutional law void and unenforceable. This should actually be beyond debate! Certainly the federal courts cannot be depended upon when it is itself a branch of the federal government. So in a dispute between the states and the federal government is the resolution to come from the federal government? God Forbid! If that were true the Federal Government has absolute power over the state and over WE THE PEOPLE. We The People are the employer and those officials of the federal government are OUR EMPLOYEES! Jefferson refused to accept the conclusion that federal government had any authority over the states. He found it incomprehensible that any state would accept subordination to an all powerful federal government that would certainly devolve into an unjust oligarchy.

Dozens of states have already employed nullification of the REAL ID Act of 2005. Nullification is being used to defy federal dictates over arms and the new health care law already. Nullification is the simple answer to the question we hear about the difficulty of restoring the Constitutional Republic.

I would like to refer you to a great read on NULLIFICATION: How To Resist Federal Tyranny in The 21st Century by Thomas E. Woods.

For those of you with reading disorders or who simply will not read here is where you can listen Woods explain Nullification. Be sure to watch all of the collection of videos of this speech so you get a better understanding of Nullification. Tom Woods Speaks on Nullification.

I thank mister Woods for his discussion of this essential political action and the education provided in his book. Every American should read it. For every political aspirant and those now in office it should be required reading. I find it reprehensible that our so-called Congressmen, Senators and government officials have so little knowledge of the Constitution if they have ever read it. Furthermore, it makes me wonder have they ever bothered to read THE FEDERALIST. I doubt it.

We are, as it is so many times stated, a nation of laws, but laws must emanate from a lawful and principled fundamental law and that is the CONSTITUTION of the Republic of the Union of States of America. To abide illegal laws is as immoral and unethical as breaking of rightful lawful laws. It is high time to chose Right from Wrong and no contract makes any Wrong a Right.

LIVE FROM LAS VEGAS! Conservatives Convention

Live In Las Vegas with RightOnLine Convention

Responsible Public Schools..

I received this from one of the Veterans who shares our talk server. There was no author given, so I will post it here as Author Anonymous. It carries a powerful message fictionally delivered by a new principal of a public school. It is so simply true that it should be the first step to returning our schools to education rather than indoctrination...

To the students and faculty of our high school:

I am your new principal, and honored to be so. There is no greater calling than to teach young people.

I would like to apprise you of some important changes coming to our school. I am making these changes because I am convinced that most of the ideas that have dominated public education in America have worked against you, against your teachers and against our country.

First, this school will no longer honor race or ethnicity. I could not care less if your racial makeup is black, brown, red, yellow or white. I could not care less if your origins are African, Latin American, Asian or European, or if your ancestors arrived here on the Mayflower or on slave ships.

The only identity I care about, the only one this school will recognize, is your individual identity -- your character, your scholarship, your humanity. And the only national identity this school will care about is American. This is an American public school, and American public schools were created to make better Americans.

If you wish to affirm an ethnic, racial or religious identity through school, you will have to go elsewhere. We will end all ethnicity - race - and non-American nationality-based celebrations. They undermine the motto of America , one of its three central values -- e pluribus Unum, "from many, one." And this school will be guided by America 's values.

This includes all after-school clubs. I will not authorize clubs that divide students based on any identities. This includes race, language, religion, sexual orientation or whatever else may become in vogue in a society divided by political correctness.

Your clubs will be based on interests and passions, not blood, ethnic, racial or other physically defined ties. Those clubs just cultivate narcissism -- an unhealthy preoccupation with the self -- while the purpose of education is to get you to think beyond yourself. So we will have clubs that transport you to the wonders and glories of art, music, astronomy, languages you do not already speak, carpentry and more. If the only extracurricular activities you can imagine being interesting in are those based on ethnic, racial or sexual identity, that means that little outside of yourself really interests you.

Second, I am uninterested in whether English is your native language. My only interest in terms of language is that you leave this school speaking and writing English as fluently as possible. The English language has united America 's citizens for over 200 years, and it will unite us at this school. It is one of the indispensable reasons this country of immigrants has always come to be one country. And if you leave this school without excellent English language skills, I would be remiss in my duty to ensure that you will be prepared to successfully compete in the American job market. We will learn other languages here -- it is deplorable that most Americans only speak English -- but if you want classes taught in your native language rather than in English, this is not your school.

Third, because I regard learning as a sacred endeavor, everything in this school will reflect learning's elevated status. This means, among other things, that you and your teachers will dress accordingly. Many people in our society dress more formally for Hollywood events than for church or school. These people have their priorities backward. Therefore, there will be a dress code at this school.

Fourth, no obscene language will be tolerated anywhere on this school's property -- whether in class, in the hallways or at athletic events. If you can't speak without using the f-word, you can't speak. By obscene language I mean the words banned by the Federal Communications Commission, plus epithets such as "Nigger," even when used by one black student to address another black, or "bitch," even when addressed by a girl to a girlfriend. It is my intent that by the time you leave this school, you will be among the few your age to instinctively distinguish between the elevated and the degraded, the holy and the obscene.

Fifth, we will end all self-esteem programs. In this school, self-esteem will be attained in only one way -- the way people attained it until decided otherwise a generation ago -- by earning it. One immediate consequence is that there will be one valedictorian, not eight.

Sixth, and last, I am reorienting the school toward academics and away from politics and propaganda. No more time will devoted to scaring you about smoking and caffeine, or terrifying you about sexual harassment or global warming. No more semesters will be devoted to condom wearing and teaching you to regard sexual relations as only or primarily a health issue. There will be no more attempts to convince you that you are a victim because you are not white, or not male, or not heterosexual or not Christian. We will have failed if any one of you graduates this school and does not consider him or herself inordinately lucky -- to be alive and to be an American.

Now, please stand and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of our country. As many of you do not know the words, your teachers will hand them out to you.


Author unknown...

WHY ARE ALTERNATIVES SURPRESSED?

Water-Powered Car
For more than three decades now, Daniel Dingel has been claiming that his car can run with water as fuel. An article from the Philippine Daily Inquirer said that Dingle built his engine as early as 1969. Dingel built a car reactor that uses electricity from a 12-volt car battery to split the ordinary tap water into hydrogen and oxygen components. The hydrogen can then be used to power the car engine.

Dingel said that a number of foreign car companies have expressed interest in his invention. The officials of the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) have dismissed Dingel's water-powered car as a hoax. In return, Dingel accused them of conspiring with oil producing countries. Dingel, however, was the not the only man on earth who is testing water as an alternative fuel. American inventors Rudolf Gunnerman and Stanley Meyer and the researchers of the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory have been pursuing similar experiments.

AIR-POWERED ENGINES

I won't go into all of the nuances of the air powered engines except to say that they work and have been around a long time. Air powered cars are now in production and should the inventors find a way to "ON-BOARD" an air driven generator the perpetual motion machine is no longer an impossible dream.

Another advantage of air cars is that the fuel should be remarkably cheap, an important consideration in this era of volatile gas prices. Some estimates say that the cars will get the equivalent of 106 miles (171 kilometers) per gallon, although compressed air will probably not be sold by the gallon. A more meaningful estimate is that it may take as little as $2 worth of electricity to fill the compressed air tank, though you'll also need gasoline to power the electric motor that compresses air while driving [source: Cornell].

The vehicles themselves also will be relatively cheap. Zero Pollution Motors, which plans to release the first air cars in the United States and estimates a sticker price of about $17,800, which would make these cars affordable to budget-conscious American buyers.

Cheaper Fuel and Economic Energy

There are more natural oil resources on the North American Continent than the rest of the world combined without deep well drilling. By just uncapping already drilled wells on land in the continental United States there is over 140 years of available crude! That does not even figure in the Natural Gas being pumped back into the ground in several oil fields to the North!

So-called Environmentalists drove oil drilling off shore in the early 1970's. There was a political and a centralist/monopolist agenda behind the perversion of the environmentalists ideals. They were being lead by socialist ideologues preying upon emotional humanism. It is an old ploy of the centralist plutocrats. Those who aspire to maintain control of the zeitgeist of a society must know how to manipulate the masses by playing upon their common, human, emotions and compassion. They use their control of the DELPHI media to maintain control of the consensus of opinion even if it requires manufacturing the illusion of a consensus opinion that does not actually exist. The same environmentalists driven by the same manipulators are now screaming the loudest about the oil spill in the GULF! Why?! They generated the outcry that created the crisis! The dangers of deep well drilling are well known. Just look at the ON LAND disasters of deep well drilling experienced in Russia for instance. However, if one was paying attention we got a bit of insight not common knowledge to we commoners about the earth's oil reservoirs. The earth is actually replenishing already drilled deposits! Did anyone pay attention to that little aside? What that means is that the EARTH itself is a renewable energy source. That is something many spiritual leaders over the centuries have always known! Had the deep well disaster in the Gulf happened on a LAND drilled well it could have been contained within hours of the event! That is something few so-called investigative journalists, so-called environmentalists and so-called political leaders are focusing upon. And it NEEDS to be pointed out over and over again!

Until we get the political/greed agenda of the centralist/monopolist plutocrats out of the way of PROGRESS there will be no logical progress made without THEIR permitting it based upon their control over the progressive innovations being made! That is what monopolist capitalism is based upon: the self assumed right of the privileged few to dictate and design the society around them. And that is exactly what every communitarian ideology dictates. That is NOT compatible with individual liberty, individual initiative, self reliance, freedom of thought or any FREEDOM!

Ever see an Air Generator field? Notice the large plateau of cleared land? Try to imagine by comparison one or two oil rigs producing all that energy on a plot of land less than a fraction of the land occupied by those massive generators. THINK! Go discover the truth about Nuclear Energy. Let me tell you a little known fact. The so-called Three Mile Island "leak" was a fabrication. It never happened! It was a contrived scare tactic. IT WORKED!

Who stands to gain from such covert activities?

The only difference in Nationalized or GLOBALIZED Centralized/Monopolist/Capitalists of SOCIALISM and the so-called free market Centralist/Monopolist/Capitalists is that now instead of having to lobby to impose legislation to protect their control over banking, industry and commerce and the geo-political zeitgeist they ARE THE LEGISLATORS and can ENFORCE their plutocratic rule! They will no longer suffer the imposition of having to deal with the opinions and free thinking individuals of the mass of humanity. That to them is the ultimate SOCIAL JUSTICE!

THE ONLY TRUE FREE MARKET IS THE LAISSEZ-FAIRE FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM OF ECONOMICS. Which directly opposes governmental controls over the market place and would basically expose Wall Street and fabricated money markets as fabricated illusions. It would also guarantee that the supply and demand curve would be natural not dictated and we would always be at the peak of GNP annually. The natural order of pure economy would prevent artificial imposed inflation-deflation of NON-INTEREST currency, thereby making fiat currency obsolete in favor of interest free currency notes. [NO neither gold nor silver or any precious material need back it... Only that it represents interest free barter notes]. The truly free market would also prevent fractional banking thus ending the international banking cartel's dictatorship over the world markets. Something they are not likely to surrender peaceably.

Meyer Rothschild's widow once remarked shortly before her death that if her sons did not want war there would be no wars. Ideologues such as Marx and Keynes and many others, with their communitarian ideologies lure humanity with the illusion of Utopian PEACE ON EARTH. The simple truth is that all life is conflict to some degree. When the arrogant among us assume they can DESIGN a societal model for all they ignore human nature, centuries of fundamental traditions and the single most important gift of the CREATOR that burns in the heart of every human being, even those who would rather someone else have the responsibility for their own welfare, INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM. The freedom to THINK as we please. The right to the fruits of our labors. To that end is what AMERICANS have been reminded so dramatically recently.

DO NOT BE FOOLED neither of the existing political parties represents the FREE ENTERPRISE market or the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE. Presently WE THE PEOPLE have an opportunity to create a NEW Constitutional Republic, restore State Sovereignty and cast off the shackles of the centralist/monopolist/capitalists. It won't be easy and it won't happen overnight. It will take years of concentrated effort and RESPONSIBLE citizenship. BUT IT CAN BE DONE!

Poster Child For What is Wrong In America

Poster-child for what is wrong

You will simply not believe this. Our 8th District US Congressional representative,

the Hon. Gabrielle Giffords, in a meeting of the House Armed Services Committee,

asked General David Petraeus the following question:

"General Petraeus, what are you doing to reduce carbon emissions in the war on terror?"

Wow. I had to read, and re-read this several times to believe it. Folks, there are American sons and daughters dying every week on the foreign battlefields of southwest Asia. The nation is completely bankrupt and ... quite literally, borrowing 43 cents for every dollar in federal spending. We have the largest environmental disaster in the nation's history in the Gulf of Mexico, and we have Mexican drug armies invading our nation. And yet ....

A member of Congress from Arizona's 8th congressional district took

the time to ask our battlefield commander what he is doing to curb

carbon emissions in the war.

Gabrielle Giffords is the poster-child for what is wrong with the US Congress. We are being led by imbeciles. To the rest of America reading this blog, and to Gen. Petraeus if this e-mail makes it to your inbox ... my sincerest apologies for the stupid question asked of you by my US congressional representative. General ... I am sure you have better things to worry about than carbon emissions on the battlefield. I assure you, as a registered voter in Arizona's 8th congressional district, I will do everything I can to ensure Rep. Giffords is voted out of office in November, and I pray you'll get back to business of fighting the war on terror without worrying about such petty and nonsensical matters as your carbon footprint in the war.

Mark Beres, Maj. USAF (ret.)

Tucson, Arizona

This is the sort of nonsense being bred into our children by the socialists to destroy nationalism and national defense in order to walk the sheeple into the New World Order of the Globalist Cabal.

What idiots like Giffords fails to understand is that he is not one of the Plutocrats who will lead or even be counted in the ruling class of the new Globalist Feudalism. He is just a lame brain without the gift of freedom of thought. He follows the indoctrination of his socialist teachers and media without an inkling of his own. This is the way our individual freedoms are being assaulted daily. If this imbecile had ever bothered to LOOK UP real information about carbon emissions he would have discovered that in millionths of parts humans and their total contribution to carbon emissions account for barely .006 of 1%. In fact, so minute a part of the carbon emissions that if it were depended upon to provide for the carbon dependent earth that all life on earth would cease to exist.

The indoctrinated and the socialist idiots need to start thinking for themselves and STOP screwing around with Mother Nature! There are things of this earth no human has control over regardless of all the technology some humans think does and it is time WE THE PEOPLE in this country put a halt to the imbecilic arrogance of our government! Especially idiots like Giffords, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, John McCain et. al.

"When Someone is Sticking a Knife Into Your Country... "

Allen West "The time for negotiations is over..."

Remind DC WE CAN

EVIL PREVAILS WHEN GOOD MEN DO NOTHING

LET THEM KNOW YOU DEMAND TO BE HEARD

KEEP THE FIRE BURNING!

DON'T TREAD ON ME

WE ARE AMERICA!

I Am America

Keep the fire of freedom burning. The fight to save our great nation is just gearing up.

Apologist America Goes Full Circle

When one studies history, if one is astute enough to look beyond the obvious, discrimination against one group or another, enslavement of conquered nations or whatever the oppression whether real or imagined, always goes full circle until the majority lashes back after sometimes generations of apologetic catering to those an earlier generation emasculated. Even the Bible records it and is all too clear that the aftermath of Solomon's appeasement of all the nationalities and ethnic groups absorbed during King David's rein and intermingled and catered to during King Solomon his son's rein began the fall of the great Hebrew Nation, which after Solomon's death was torn asunder by the Hebrew tribes pure bloods conflicts with the mixed bloods and various absorbed ethnics. There is not a lot of detail recorded in our translation, though there are volumes buried in the Vatican which we cannot imagine.

We are living in the times when the fringe groups that have been used to divide we who love and cherish our heritage and freedoms. The Alinsky plan played and preying upon the less intelligent and less spiritual. True they do not see themselves this way. They have been indoctrinated that they are the downtrodden and deserve to special attention just because they were born whatever ethnic or color. It is no different with the minority at the other end of the status pole, the establishment elitists, they too feel they have special right to be immune from the majority and given special treatment in all things of life. What is most interesting is that the Majority is expected to give privilege to both the upper fringe and the lower fringe minorities without question nor concern for itself.

That sort of disparity cannot endure for very long without a backlash. The Alinskyites know this as surely as the Marxists and other advocates of societal designing did, though many of the communitarian theorists did not seem to understand it and their rabid following understand it even less. Such tampering with Man's nature without the intellect or soul to do so guarantees disaster. There is no way to avoid it for once the diversity goes full circle the backlash is inevitable. Therein lies the challenge for we who wish to save our nation rather than destroy it.

History records many societies destroyed by just this sort of diversity to apologist to backlash cycle. In every case it has led to the destruction of cultures and political foundations from within. Even modern countries still having the illusion of existence are not the heritage of their forefathers. And now we are amidst the backlash of the majority in our own country with the Marxists and Alinskyites trying to stir the fringe groups into acts that will demand reprisal from our ranks to justify dismantling of our country.

I heard a Democrat... yes the Socialists are still calling themselves Democrats.., call the Tea Party movement a "Cult." And even the GOP is trying to discredit the Tea Party and other populous groups trying to restore the Republic. What I find so curious in that vein is that the NAACP, Black Panthers, Black Nation, Code Pink, KKK and so many other socialist and fascist groups actually have become CULTS. Not the number one definition, but one of the definitions of a cult is the cure of a disease based on dogma set forth by it's promulgator. Too often this becomes a faddish devotion to a lie or misconception put forth by those who would stand to gain directly or indirectly from such devotion. All one needs to do is study these groups to understand their leaders true colors. That includes the two PARTIES as well.

Beware those bringing ripe fruit to the table without invitation. Snow White was foolish. So was Samson. THINK!

Socialism is Monopolist/Capitalist/Collectivist Plutocracy

Let me first point out that the special interests who have the most influence over our government going back to the very beginning are almost every single one of them centralist-collectivist-monopolist either collectively or each one, each is the same and has had implemented legislation, which in every case protected their own interests OR was so designed to benefit their and often government REVENUES. Socialism does NOT change monopolist/capitalism! Socialism ENFORCES monopolist/capitalism by eliminating any competition! PERIOD! The centralist/monopoly is now [under a socialist government] a tyrannical PLUTOCRACY!

Man does not, cannot, know everything. Those who act as though they do [the way the arrogant leaders in DC are] GUARANTEE catastrophe! Socialism, every collectivist design, is the ultimate arrogance. Those who have the arrogance to believe they are competent to do societal planning without sufficient knowledge to be tampering with the nature of man ignore the traditions that embody the wisdom of generations, disregard customs whose purpose they do not understand and confuse the law that burns in the hearts of man - which they cannot change - with administrative rules and legislated laws that they alter at their own whim. Such CONCEIT is THE "FATAL ERROR" of all collectivist, communitarian designs whether economics, commerce or socially. IT CANNOT WORK! It will always lead to violence and destruction WITHIN.

And that is the simplistic encapsulation of THE ROAD TO SERFDOM by F.A. Hayek 1944

http://hayekcenter.org/?p=682

If you have not read Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals better read it... You've been living it! You are living it!

http://www.google.com/search?q=saul+alinsky+rules+for+radicals+pdf&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

The Face of Treason

The Face of Treason

The Fascist Regime U.S.A. It is becoming all the more apparent that the government is no longer of and for WE THE PEOPLE. The fascist socialism is already in Martial Law mode and ready to go turbo. How long will WE THE PEOPLE endure the tyranny?

National Military Forces Against U. S. Civilians Illegal

The use of "any" "National" military units against U.S. Citizens is expressly prohibited by the Constitution.

In New York and other states the National Guard and now the Coast Guard are being used to detain and prohibit free movement within the Continental U. S.

This is quoted from an article from Infowars... But part of the acclimation process is getting military units to accept the role of domestic law enforcers without questioning the illegal orders they are being given.

"The use of National Guard units in arresting American citizens and patrolling the streets is part of the acclimation process to make Americans accept the sight of military assets engaging in domestic law enforcement as a routine occurrence. In rolling out this program under the pretext of the war on drugs, authorities are attempting to perform a slick end run around Posse Comitatus, which would normally make it illegal for the military to conduct such operations.

In the past, scenes of troops ordering citizens around were widely denounced as being characteristic of an authoritarian, backward, dictatorial country under a state of martial law. America was seen as the leading light of the world because its people were free from this tyranny. Now that American is under a de facto state of martial law, such scenes are becoming commonplace.

The fact that many of these Guard troops are returning from Afghanistan and Iraq, where they are part of an occupying force trained to round up and detain the host population in prison camps for the most minor of infractions is also a shocking facet to this story.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

As we highlighted yesterday, National Guard units are now being deployed for things like traffic control in places like Kingman Arizona, and providing security at sports events like the Kentucky Derby.

As we reported in 2008, U.S. troops returning from Iraq are now occupying America, running checkpoints and training to deal with “civil unrest and crowd control” under the auspices of a Northcom program that by 2011 will have no less than 20,000 active duty troops deployed inside America to “help” state and local officials during times of emergency.

We have documented numerous instances of troops and National Guard personnel being used to perform law enforcement duties which are transparently outside the purview of the Guard’s supposed role to respond to national emergencies and therefore completely illegal.

In January 2009, soldiers from the Lynchburg-based 1st Battalion, 116th Brigade Combat Team, were used to conduct personal searches at checkpoints in Washington DC for the inauguration of Barack Obama.

In March of that same year, we reported on U.S. Army troops dispatched to patrol the streets of Samson, Alabama, after a murder spree.

On April 6, we reported on a DHS, federal, state, Air Force, and local law enforcement checkpoint in Tennessee. On April 3, Infowars was instrumental in the cancellation of a seatbelt checkpoint that was to be conducted in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security and the 251st Military Police in Bolivar, Tennessee.

In December 2008, we reported on the Marine Corps Air and Ground Combat Center dispatching troops to work with police on checkpoints in in San Bernardino County, California.

On April 22 2009, we reported the deployment of 400 National Guard Combat Support Battalion troops to “maintain public order” at the Boston Marathon.

In June 2008, Infowars posted an article by D. H. Williams of the Daily Newscaster reporting the deployment of 2,300 Marines in the city of Indianapolis under the direction of FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.

We also reported a story on April 22 2009 covering the assault of a local television news team by an irate police officer in El Paso, Texas. A video taken by the news videographer shows uniformed soldiers working with police officers at the scene of a car accident.

If we accept the seamless integration of troops into law enforcement then America as the “land of the free” will cease to exist for good, to be replaced by an oppressive Sovietized police state with an overlay of 21st century technology designed to monitor and control our every movement. This is only made more alarming by the fact that the National Guard are now training with foreign troops to take on American “terrorists” as part of this integration process."

Obama - High Treason

Obama commits High Treason

This is a direct violation of the Constitution.

Socialism-Culture of Mass Murder

One of the primary aspects of Socialism wherever it gains power is the genocide imperative...

Culture of Mass Murder

Patrick Henry's Speech At St John's Church 1775

Virginian Patrick Henry's famous speech delivered at St John's Church in 1775 carries much more significance than simply the words we all know so well, "give me liberty or give me death." It is the articulated soul of Man's struggle to be free... As the Creator intended.

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free– if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending–if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained–we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace– but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

Generation Zero - An Awakening

http://www.generationzeromovie.com/

Spotlights need to be on every weakness that we may rebuild our nation's infrastructure and purge socialism from our government.

Personally I believe that a new industrial revolution is needed in this country. Uncap the oil wells already existing in the continental U.S., open the factories and deregulate our domestic production and demand. Go back to basics. WE AMERICANS are the most productive population on the face of the earth. Faith in God. Faith in our ability. Time to restore our strength. PRODUCE OUR OWN PROSPERITY. That is HOMELAND security!

Five Truths that Republicans Hate

By Joel McDurmon | Published: July 2, 2010

Share

0diggsdigg

Print

X

Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to our RSS feeds for updates on this topic and others.

On Wednesday Gary posted the list “Five Truths that Liberals Hate,” and it proved one of the most popular posts we’ve had in a while. While in total agreement with those ideals, and actually probably the most conservative guy at American Vision, I thought a little Tabasco for the Right was in order as well. So let’s hear it: five truths Republicans hate.

1. Most Republicans are as socialist as the Left. While not as socially liberal as the left—not advocating equality, gay rights, feminism, etc., etc.—Republicans have proven every bit as fiscally liberal with the exception of the last year or so when political convenience has changed their rhetoric. But try to get one to admit that social security and medicare are socialist programs along the lines of Obamacare, and they’ll dance and dodge all day! It was Bush II who created medicare prescription drug coverage at the cost of $550 billion, and only nine Senate republicans opposed.

2. Public schooling is a socialist institution, paid for like a social welfare scheme, where socialist teachers teach socialism to conservatives’ kids. It was designed as an anti-conservative institution and operates openly as an anti-conservative institution. Yet most conservative parents still mock homeschooling and refuse to put their kids in even a private school. Some Christians argue they’re salt and light—”we just need prayer back in schools!” The only prayer any kid should be praying in school is “Mom! Dad! Please! Get me out!”

3. There is no such thing as private property as long as property taxes and the threat of liens exist. Bad-mouthing Obama’s socialism rings hollow until you pressure your state, county, and municipal officials to abolish property taxes. Of course, you’d also have to argue against public schooling as well, for about 75% of property taxes go to pay for public schools.

4. There is nothing inherently or historically conservative about our national standing military. It was a Republican-led effort that ignored everything the American founders wrote about the dangers of standing armies and centralized the state militias into a national army, the outlawed state militias. Shortly after the Militia Act of 1903, in one ten year span before WWI, the military budget rose from $2 million to $53 million—a 2,650% budget increase. The whole program was carried out by Progressives which at that time dominated the Republican Party. These were men whom Republicans generally revere as well, Republicans: William McKinley, Teddy Roosevelt, William H. Taft, Elihu Root. Historically, big war has been carried out under progressive Democrats: Wilson got us into WW1, FDR WWII, Truman Korea, and Kennedy/Johnson Vietnam. Progressives love war inherently: it was one aspect that grew directly out of social Darwinism. Conservatives fight when necessary to protect their own land and freedom, except against property taxes, apparently.

5. Republicans were the original spend-and-tax, big-government Progressives, and remain so today. The same Republican men who nationalized the military, in order to fund their progressive ideals, created, promoted, and signed into law the Sixteenth amendment (national income tax) which had the side-effect of rendering the IRS a permanent institution. Taft got the act through Congress in 1909, the last state ratified it in 1913. The intervening presidential election was a contest of three men with the same ideals—Wilson, T. Roosevelt, and Taft—all of whom supported the national income tax. The same Republicans instituted the National Monetary Commission which developed the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which Wilson also signed into law. In modern times, were it not for Obama, Bush II would reign as the spending and deficit king by quite a margin. The biggest spenders in recent decades were all the Republican presidents, including Reagan. Only Clinton in his first term rivaled them before Obama.

So there you have it. These are five truths that Republicans just have to hate! But thankfully, we have a God-given right to change our minds and become truly conservative. See my God versus Socialism for a look at where the Bible stands on such issues, and how the U.S. already has adopted seven of the ten planks of communism straight from Marx’s Manifesto.

Actually The US adopted 8 planks of the Communist Manifesto during FDR's Administration. In fact the Communist Party USA applauded FDR for having "legislated more planks of the Communist Manifesto into law in the US more successfully than anything done in Russia." [This was while the USSR was still being formed]

Eisenhower Deported 12 Million Immigrants

In the 1950's President Ike Eisenhower went on a campaign to rid the United States of illegal immigrants to preserve U.S. jobs for U.S. citizens. It took 2 years, but without modern technology the Eisenhower Administration was responsible for deporting over 12 million illegals back to where they came from.

Why do we hear the constant chime that illegal immigration laws are unenforceable? The refrain that "you can't deport 12 million illegals" !!! Who the hey says so? Not so ancient history, less than 60 years ago, Ike Eisenhower DID IT! It took two years, but he got the job done. How? By having a clear objective and a determination to enforce the law as it is written and intended. That is key! Our elected officials are betraying their oath of office at every instance they excuse or are actively ignoring the law! Every time they ignore the Constitution of the United States they commit high treason! Every time others in our Houses of Congress, the President or any of the appointed Administration, or Judiciary ignore the absolutes set forth in the Constitution they are guilty of High Treason. How long do WE THE PEOPLE endure the road to serfdom?

We must demand our rightful place in the governance of OUR country! Take back the Constitutional Republic.